Collateral damage from agricultural netting to open-country bird populations in Thailand
Journal article
Authors/Editors
Strategic Research Themes
Publication Details
Author list: Rongrong Angkaew, Philip D. Round, Dusit Ngoprasert, Larkin A. Powell, Wich'yanan Limparungpatthanakij, George A. Gale
Publisher: Wiley Open Access
Publication year: 2022
Journal acronym: CSP
Volume number: 4
Issue number: 11
ISSN: 2578-4854
eISSN: 2578-4854
URL: https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.12810
Abstract
Nets are used across a wide variety of food production landscapes to control avian
pests typically resulting in deaths of entangled birds. However, the impact of nets
on bird populations is a human–wildlife conflict that remains mostly unquantified.
Here, we examined the scale of netting in the central plains of Thailand, a
region dominated by ricefields, among which aquaculture ponds are increasingly
interspersed. Nets/exclusion types, number of individual birds and species caught
were recorded on 1312 road-survey transects (2-km length 0.4-km width). We
also interviewed 104 local farmers. The transect sampling took place in late-
September 2020, and from December 2020 to April 2021. Each survey transect
was visited only once. We found 1881 nets and barriers of parallel cords on
196 (15%) of the transects. Counts of nets and barriers were ~13 times higher than
expected in aquaculture ponds based on their areal proportion, and vertical nets
were the most commonly observed type (n = 1299). We documented 735 individuals
of at least 45 bird species caught in the nets and parallel cords, including
many species not regarded as pests. Approximately 20% of individuals caught in
ricefields and 95% at aquaculture ponds were non-target bycatch. Our interviews
suggested that 55% of respondents thought nets were ineffective while only 6%
thought they were effective. We suggest imposing a ban on netting, considering
other mitigation strategies to reduce conflicts such as promoting the use of parallel
cords, and prioritizing conservation actions with community participation. Further
studies should investigate the efficacy of less deleterious deterrents.
Keywords
aquaculture, human-wildlife conflict