A Study of Sustainability Concepts for Developing Green Universities in Thailand
Journal article
Authors/Editors
Strategic Research Themes
Publication Details
Author list: Preecha Aregarot, Kuskana Kubaha and Siriluk Chiarakorn2
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert
Publication year: 2024
Volume number: 16
Issue number: 7
Start page: 1
End page: 18
Number of pages: 18
ISSN: 1937-0695
eISSN: 1937-0709
URL: https://www.mdpi.com/jounal/sustainability
Abstract
Abstract: Developing universities to become green and sustainable universities is important. This is in line with the world's sustainable development guidelines. In developing a university towards being green and sustainable, different sustainability assessment criteria have been used, including the UI GreenMetric, GRI, STARS, AUN, THE'S Impact Ranking, and AISHE. Each criterion is designed in a broad-spectrum manner that is not specific. Therefore, this research aims to develop sustainable and green university assessment indicators that suit the national context in Thailand, both in terms of the size and location of universities. Based on the criteria from the UI GreenMetric, there are six categories, totaling 51 indicators. Thus, this study aims to analyze the weaknesses and strengths of each indicator using a questionnaire distributed by the Sustainable University Network of Thailand to all 36 universities, as well as organizing a meeting with sustainability experts (focus group) in each area. To obtain appropriate indicators and to prioritize each indicator, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and weighted arithmetic mean (WAM) method were used to develop an index of sustainability assessment criteria (GU SI) suitable for the Thai context. The results of this study show that the newly developed GU SI comprises seven aspects, including a total of 27 indicators. These are criteria that can be used to assess the sustainability of small, medium, and large universities. They are not complex, are straightforward to use, and more importantly, reflect the Thai context. By applying these new sustainability assessment criteria, it was found that the universities sampled in this study yielded significantly high scores. This study is limited by its application of sustainability assessments to only universities in Thailand. Though there are different contexts across different Thai universities, the proposed indicators can still be used to evaluate the sustainability of universities in Thailand.
Keywords: sustainability; green university; indicators; analytic hierarchy process; weighted arithmetic mean
Keywords
Analytical hierarchy process, green university, Sustainability