Performance Comparison between Anaerobic Hybrid Reactor and Anaerobic Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor for High-Strength Fresh Leachate Treatment

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes


Publication Details

Author listSutthiprapa, Sakulrat; Towprayoon, Sirintornthep; Chiemchaisri, Chart; Chaiprasert, Pawinee; Wangyao, Komsilp

Publication year2024

Volume number33

Issue number3

Start page2307

End page2315

Number of pages9

ISSN1230-1485

eISSN2083-5906

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85186203236&doi=10.15244%2fpjoes%2f174785&partnerID=40&md5=17b25e5655761c8ef7cc705bebb8b222

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View on publisher site


Abstract

This study aimed to examine the performance of an anaerobic hybrid reactor (AHR) and an anaerobic continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) for treating high-strength fresh leachate. As the organic loading rate (OLR) was increased in both systems, the pH decreased, with the lowest pH corresponding to an OLR of 25-30 kgCOD/m3·d. The AHR system demonstrated instability in total volatile fatty acids when the OLR increased to 20 kgCOD/m3·d. The highest methane (CH4) content was achieved when the OLR was 15 kgCOD/m3·d. Moreover, the AHR showed excellent sediment retention. When the OLR increased, volatile suspended solids (VSS) in the system increased. The CH4 content tended to increase as the OLR increased up to 20 kgCOD/m3·d. The highest CH4 content in the AHR was 68%, which was higher than that of the CSTR. The CSTR could not produce biogas when the OLR was 20 kgCOD/m3·d. The optimal OLR for the operation of AHR and CSTR treating fresh leachate was found to be 15 and 10 kgCOD/m3·d respectively. © 2024, HARD Publishing Company. All rights reserved.


Keywords

waste transfer station


Last updated on 2024-07-06 at 00:00