Bidirectional Adaptation of Shared Autonomous Vehicles and Old Towns’ Urban Spaces: The Views of Residents on the Present

Journal article

Authors/Editors

Strategic Research Themes

Publication Details

Author list: Zhang Z.; Chen X.; Teeravarunyou S.; Budthimedhee K.; Yao S.

Publisher: MDPI

Publication year: 2025

Journal acronym: WEVJ

Volume number: 16

Issue number: 7

Start page: 1

End page: 31

Number of pages: 31

ISSN: 2032-6653

eISSN: 2032-6653

URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105011535806&doi=10.3390%2Fwevj16070395&partnerID=40&md5=cf5843dd8549f9237215b5f934c3044c

Languages: English-Great Britain (EN-GB)

View on publisher site

Abstract

The integration of shared autonomous vehicles into historic urban areas presents both opportunities and challenges. In heritage-rich environments like very old Asian (such as Suzhou old town, which serves as a use case example) or European (especially Mediterranean coastal cities) areas—characterized by narrow alleys, dense development, and sensitive cultural landscapes—shared autonomous vehicle adoption raises critical spatial and social questions. This study employs a qualitative, user-centered approach based on the ripple model to examine residents’ perceptions across four dimensions: residential patterns, parking land use, regional accessibility, and street-level infrastructure. Semi-structured interviews with 27 participants reveal five key findings: (1) public trust depends on transparent decision-making and safety guarantees; (2) shared autonomous vehicles may reshape generational residential clustering; (3) the short-term parking demand remains stable, but the long-term reuse of space is feasible; (4) shared autonomous vehicles could enhance accessibility in historic cores; (5) transport systems may evolve toward intelligent, human-centered designs. Based on these insights, the study proposes three strategies: (1) transparent risk assessment using explainable artificial intelligence and digital twins; (2) polycentric development to diversify land use; (3) hierarchical street retrofitting to balance mobility and preservation. While this study is limited by its qualitative scope and absence of simulation, it offers a framework for culturally sensitive, small-scale interventions supporting sustainable mobility transitions in historic urban contexts. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

No matching items found.