Comparison of electro-oxidation coupled with UV irradiation (UV/EO) versus conventional oxidation processes (UV irradiation, chlorination, electro-oxidation, and UV/chlorine) for atenolol removal: role of operating parameters, energy performance, and toxicity

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes


Publication Details

Author listDuangkaew, P.; Phattarapattamawong, S.

PublisherRoyal Society of Chemistry

Publication year2025

JournalRSC Advances (2046-2069)

Volume number15

Issue number43

Start page35739

End page35748

Number of pages10

ISSN2046-2069

eISSN2046-2069

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105018740397&doi=10.1039%2Fd5ra05011a&partnerID=40&md5=23b35a05b208105f2eea57e73cbc810b

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View on publisher site


Abstract

In this study, electro-oxidation combined with UV irradiation (UV/EO) was used for atenolol (ATL) removal, and the results were compared with those of electro-oxidation (EO), UV irradiation, UV/chlorine, and chlorination. In addition, effects of current density (CD), UV intensity, electric potential, electrolyte (NaCl) concentration, ATL concentration, pH, and free radicals were studied. The UV/EO process was the most effective for ATL removal, followed by UV/chlorine, EO, chlorination, and UV irradiation. The ATL degradation was described by a pseudo-first-order rate model, and the observed rate constant (k') for UV/EO exhibited a direct proportionality to CD, NaCl concentration, and UV intensity. In contrast, the results were opposite for pH and ATL concentration. A change in the electric potential did not affect the UV/EO efficiency. The energy consumption of the UV/EO process exhibited an inverse proportionality to the k' value. ˙OH played the major role in ATL removal, while the role of RCS was minor. The kinetic degradation of ATL by ˙Cl (kCl˙) was 1.55 × 1011 M−1 s−1. Intermediate products formed during ATL oxidation exhibited higher toxicity than the parent compound. This finding highlights the potential risks associated with the formation of highly toxic byproducts. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the design and operating parameters of the UV/EO system to prevent the formation and accumulation of harmful intermediates. © 2025 The Royal Society of Chemistry.


Keywords

No matching items found.


Last updated on 2026-22-01 at 13:25