Comparing membrane resistance and absorption performance of three different membranes in a gas absorption membrane contactor

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Author listKhaisri S., deMontigny D., Tontiwachwuthikul P., Jiraratananon R.

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2009

JournalSeparation and Purification Technology (1383-5866)

Volume number65

Issue number3

Start page290

End page297

Number of pages8

ISSN1383-5866

eISSN1873-3794

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-60549112827&doi=10.1016%2fj.seppur.2008.10.035&partnerID=40&md5=adaf846d963a1c385703eb4ac655ad78

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science


Abstract

Hollow fiber membrane contactors have been studied extensively in the last decade. Gas absorption membrane (GAM) contactors are a developing technology that overcome the disadvantage of conventional equipment. Three different membranes, including polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polypropylene (PP), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), were used to test the performance of a GAM system in both physical and chemical absorption studies. In the physical absorption experiments, pure CO2 and de-ionized water were used in the GAM system. A Wilson plot was used to determine the membrane resistance in this work. From the results, the PVDF membrane had a higher CO2 flux than PP membranes and the highest membrane resistance. In the chemical absorption experiments, a simulated flue gas stream (15% CO2 and 85% air) was treated with monoethanolamine (MEA) solutions. Experimental results showed that the CO2 absorption performance can be ranked as PTFE > PVDF > PP. While the PTFE membrane had the best performance in the GAM system, the PVDF membrane is an alternative membrane that could be used. The stability of PTFE and PVDF membranes was tested continuously over 60 h of operation. The PTFE membranes maintained their absorption performance, while the PVDF membranes did not maintain their absorption performance over the operating time. ฉ 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Keywords

PolytetrafluoroethylenePolyvinylidene fluoride


Last updated on 2023-04-10 at 07:35