Stop-Signaling Reduces Split Decisions without Impairing Accuracy in the Honeybee Nest-Site Selection Process

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Author listLaomettachit T., Termsaithong T., Sae-Tang A., Duangphakdee O.

PublisherSpringer

Publication year2016

JournalJournal of Insect Behavior (0892-7553)

Volume number29

Issue number5

Start page557

End page577

Number of pages21

ISSN0892-7553

eISSN1572-8889

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84984823796&doi=10.1007%2fs10905-016-9581-1&partnerID=40&md5=5db1c91beb1bd9054e7c5ec7ea5af7e4

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science


Abstract

In the honeybee swarm nest-site selection process, individual bees gather information about available candidate sites and communicate the information to other bees. The swarm makes an agreement for a candidate site when the number of bees that supports the site reaches a threshold. This threshold is usually referred to as the quorum threshold and it is shown by many studies as a key parameter that is a compromise between the accuracy and speed of decisions. In the present work, we use a model of the honeybee Apis mellifera nest-site selection process to study how the quorum threshold and discovery time of candidate sites have major impact on two unfavorable situations in selecting a nest site: decision deadlock and decision split. We show that cross-inhibitory stop-signaling, delivered among bees supporting different sites, enables swarms to avoid the decision split problem in addition to avoiding the decision deadlock problem that has been previously proposed. We also show that stop-signaling improves decision speed, but compromises decision accuracy in swarms using high quorum thresholds by causing the swarms to be trapped in local optima (e.g., choosing a sub-optimal option that is encountered first). On the other hand, we demonstrate that stop-signaling can reduce split decisions without compromising decision accuracy in swarms using low quorum thresholds when it is compared to the accuracy of swarms using the same threshold values but not exhibiting stop-signaling. Based on our simulations, we suggest that swarms using low quorum thresholds (as well as swarms with large population sizes) would benefit more from exhibiting the stop-signaling activity than not exhibiting it. ฉ 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.


Keywords

decision deadlockdecision splitlocal optimaspeed-accuracy trade-off


Last updated on 2023-02-10 at 07:35