Phylogenetically structured differences in rRNA gene sequence variation among species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their implications for sequence clustering

Journal article

Authors/Editors

WITTAYA KAONONGBUA

Strategic Research Themes

No matching items found.

Publication Details

Author list: House G.L., Ekanayake S., Ruan Y., Sch�tte U.M.E., Kaonongbua W., Fox G., Ye Y., Bevera J.D.

Publisher: American Society for Microbiology

Publication year: 2016

Journal: Applied and Environmental Microbiology (0099-2240)

Volume number: 82

Issue number: 16

Start page: 4921

End page: 4930

Number of pages: 10

ISSN: 0099-2240

eISSN: 1098-5336

URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84982128228&doi=10.1128%2fAEM.00816-16&partnerID=40&md5=9bb2b98ee36c58c669d9816bdef766bf

Languages: English-Great Britain (EN-GB)

View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form mutualisms with plant roots that increase plant growth and shape plant communities. Each AM fungal cell contains a large amount of genetic diversity, but it is unclear if this diversity varies across evolutionary lineages. We found that sequence variation in the nuclear large-subunit (LSU) rRNA gene from 29 isolates representing 21 AM fungal species generally assorted into genus- and species-level clades, with the exception of species of the genera Claroideoglomus and Entrophospora. However, there were significant differences in the levels of sequence variation across the phylogeny and between genera, indicating that it is an evolutionarily constrained trait in AM fungi. These consistent patterns of sequence variation across both phylogenetic and taxonomic groups pose challenges to interpreting operational taxonomic units (OTUs) as approximations of species-level groups of AM fungi. We demonstrate that the OTUs produced by five sequence clustering methods using 97% or equivalent sequence similarity thresholds failed to match the expected species of AM fungi, although OTUs from AbundantOTU, CD-HIT-OTU, and CROP corresponded better to species than did OTUs from mothur or UPARSE. This lack of OTU-to-species correspondence resulted both from sequences of one species being split into multiple OTUs and from sequences of multiple species being lumped into the same OTU. The OTU richness therefore will not reliably correspond to the AM fungal species richness in environmental samples. Conservatively, this error can overestimate species richness by 4-fold or underestimate richness by one-half, and the direction of this error will depend on the genera represented in the sample. ฉ 2016, American Society for Microbiology.

Keywords