Comparison of friction forces between stainless orthodontic steel brackets and TiNi wires in wet and dry conditions

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Author listPhukaoluan A., Khantachawana A., Kaewtatip P., Dechkunakorn S., Anuwongnukroh N., Santiwong P., Kajornchaiyakul J.

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2017

JournalInternational Orthodontics (1761-7227)

Volume number15

Issue number1

Start page13

End page24

Number of pages12

ISSN1761-7227

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011304727&doi=10.1016%2fj.ortho.2016.12.017&partnerID=40&md5=d3060540f25109574cd3bc25a7e89a4b

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science


Abstract

In sliding mechanics, frictional force is an important counter-balancing element to orthodontic tooth movement, which must be controlled in order to allow application of light continuous forces. The purpose of this study was to compare the frictional forces between a stainless steel bracket and five different wire alloys under dry and wet (artificial saliva) conditions. TiNi, TiNiCu, TiNiCo, commercial wires A and commercial wires B with equal dimensions of 0.016 × 0.022′′ were tested in this experiment. The stainless steel bracket was chosen with a slot dimension of 0.022′′. Micro-hardness of the wires was measured by the Vickers micro-hardness test. Surface topography of wires was measured by an optical microscope and quantified using surface roughness testing. Static and kinetic friction forces were measured using a custom-designed apparatus, with a 3-mm stretch of wire alloy at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The static and dynamic frictions in the wet condition tended to decrease more slowly than those in the dry condition. Therefore, the friction of TiNiCu and commercial wires B would increase. Moreover, these results were associated with scarred surfaces, i.e. the increase in friction would result in a larger bracket microfracture. From the results, it is seen that copper addition resulted in an increase in friction under both wet and dry conditions. However, the friction in the wet condition was less than that in dry condition due to the lubricating effect of artificial saliva. © 2016 CEO


Keywords

Friction forceStainless steel bracket


Last updated on 2023-02-10 at 07:35