Method Development for Including Environmental Water Requirement in the Water Stress Index

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Author listNilsalab P., Gheewala S.H., Pfister S.

PublisherSpringer

Publication year2018

JournalWater Resources Management (0920-4741)

Volume number32

Issue number5

Start page1585

End page1598

Number of pages14

ISSN0920-4741

eISSN1573-1650

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85041676922&doi=10.1007%2fs11269-017-1892-2&partnerID=40&md5=5685aba60a0378cfc39c4f83eb7f0777

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science


Abstract

The overuse of human demand for water threatens the capacity of rivers or watersheds to retain their ecosystem services. Environmental water requirement (EWR) needs to be taken explicitly into account when assessing the impact from freshwater use on freshwater resources. Thus, we propose two perspectives for incorporating EWR into the Demand to availability (DTA) ratio of the water stress index (WSI); including it as a separate demand along with anthropogenic demands (Index 1) or reserving it from the available water (Index 2). It is expected that the more demand increases, the more pressure is put on the lowest priority sector. Index 2, by definition, gives the first priority to EWR whereas this is not so for Index 1. Thus Index 2 provides a more conservative approach in terms of the environmental protection and Index 1 allows a more flexible prioritization approach. Both these indices, however, allow flexibility of changing the EWR based on specific circumstances and context, thus making the evaluation more appropriate for water resource planning at both policy and implementation levels. ฉ 2018, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature.


Keywords

Decision supportScreening indicator


Last updated on 2023-15-10 at 07:36