Having more choices changes how human observers weight stable sensory evidence

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Author listItthipuripat S., Cha K., Deering S., Salazar A.M., Serences J.T.

PublisherSociety for Neuroscience

Publication year2018

JournalThe Journal of Neuroscience (0270-6474)

Volume number38

Issue number40

Start page8635

End page8649

Number of pages15

ISSN0270-6474

eISSN1529-2401

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85054426585&doi=10.1523%2fJNEUROSCI.0440-18.2018&partnerID=40&md5=049329325f33aeba8b94e7e6b105c1e3

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science


Abstract

Decision-making becomes slower when more choices are available. Existing models attribute this slowing to poor sensory processing, to attenuated rates of sensory evidence accumulation, or to increases in the amount of evidence required before committing to a decision (a higher decision threshold). However, studies have not isolated the effects of having more choices on sensory and decision-related processes from changes in task difficulty and divided attention. Here, we controlled task difficulty while independently manipulating the distribution of attention and the number of choices available to male and female human observers. We used EEG to measure steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) and a frontal late positive deflection (LPD), EEG markers of sensory and postsensory decision-related processes, respectively. We found that dividing attention decreased SSVEP and LPD amplitudes, consistent with dampened sensory responses and slower rates of evidence accumulation, respectively. In contrast, having more choices did not alter SSVEP amplitude and led to a larger LPD. These results suggest that having more options largely spares early sensory processing and slows down decision-making via a selective increase in decision thresholds. Copyright ฉ 2018 the authors.


Keywords

Decision thresholdDivided attentionEvent-related potentialEvidence accumulationMultiple-choice decision-makingSteady-state visually evoked potential


Last updated on 2023-04-10 at 07:37