A model of infection in honeybee colonies with social immunity

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes


Publication Details

Author listLaomettachit T., Liangruksa M., Termsaithong T., Tangthanawatsakul A., Duangphakdee O.

PublisherPublic Library of Science

Publication year2021

JournalPLoS ONE (1932-6203)

Volume number16

Issue number2

Start pagee0247294

ISSN1932-6203

eISSN1932-6203

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85102019622&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0247294&partnerID=40&md5=bec3365c76dec12e2ee72d14f168deb8

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science


Abstract

Honeybees (Apis mellifera) play a significant role in the pollination of various food crops and plants. In the past decades, honeybee management has been challenged with increased pathogen and environmental pressure associating with increased beekeeping costs, having a marked economic impact on the beekeeping industry. Pathogens have been identified as a contributing cause of colony losses. Evidence suggested a possible route of pathogen transmission among bees via oral-oral contacts through trophallaxis. Here we propose a model that describes the transmission of an infection within a colony when bee members engage in the trophallactic activity to distribute nectar. In addition, we examine two important features of social immunity, defined as collective disease defenses organized by honeybee society. First, our model considers the social segregation of worker bees. The segregation limits foragers, which are highly exposed to pathogens during foraging outside the nest, from interacting with bees residing in the inner parts of the nest. Second, our model includes a hygienic response, by which healthy nurse bees exterminate infected bees to mitigate horizontal transmission of the infection to other bee members. We propose that the social segregation forms the first line of defense in reducing the uptake of pathogens into the colony. If the first line of defense fails, the hygienic behavior provides a second mechanism in preventing disease spread. Our study identifies the rate of egg-laying as a critical factor in maintaining the colony's health against an infection. We propose that winter conditions which cease or reduce the egg-laying activity combined with an infection in early spring can compromise the social immunity defenses and potentially cause colony losses. Copyright: © 2021 Laomettachit et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Keywords

No matching items found.


Last updated on 2023-17-10 at 07:36