Does Digital Governance do Exist in Thai Organizations? Maturity and Its Determinants
บทความในวารสาร
ผู้เขียน/บรรณาธิการ
กลุ่มสาขาการวิจัยเชิงกลยุทธ์
รายละเอียดสำหรับงานพิมพ์
รายชื่อผู้แต่ง: Benjawan Kunviroteluck and Patipan Sae-Lim
ผู้เผยแพร่: Kalahari Journals
ปีที่เผยแพร่ (ค.ศ.): 2022
ชื่อย่อของวารสาร: IJME
Volume number: 7
Issue number: 1
หน้าแรก: 5251
หน้าสุดท้าย: 5261
จำนวนหน้า: 11
นอก: 0974-5823
URL: https://kalaharijournals.com/resources/IJME_Vol7.1_510.pdf
บทคัดย่อ
Digital technology is one of the elements that plays a significant role to business and society. Firms adopt it to stimulate business growth and reduce long-term operational cost. However, it does not mean that firms can employ it by ignorance of its governance. Digital governance is then vital to control transparency and, accountability by following the principle of good governance. To this concern, the researchers
hypothesized that 1) “are there any concerns in digital governance in Thai organizations 2) in which any factors lead to the high maturity of digital governance? The quantitative model given discriminant analysis was conducted under three explanatory factors: leadership, technology acceptance, and organizational culture. The maturity of digital governance was measured using Capability Maturity Model
Integration (CMMI). According to the result, all explanatory factors are significantly associated with the digital governance. Whenclassifying the maturity of digital governance, it was found that leadership and organizational culture affected the digital governance at a high level.
คำสำคัญ
Determinant, Digital Governance, Leader