Natural versus Saccharomyces boulardii self-induced anaerobic coffee fermentation: Effects on physicochemical properties and microbial ecology, and their influence on volatile profiles and sensory attributes across roast levels

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes


Publication Details

Author listJatuphol Pholtaisong, Chatchol Kongsinkaew, Thapanut On-Mee, Supenya Chittapun, Soisuda Pornpukdeewattana, Tatsaporn Todhanakasem, Kannika Kunyanee, Atikorn Panya, Natthaporn Phonsatta, Prapussorn Yingcharoen, Theppanya Charoenrat

PublisherELSEVIER

Publication year2025

Journal acronym-

Volume number488

URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814625021223?via%3Dihub


View on publisher site


Abstract

This study investigates the effects of natural self-induced anaerobic fermentation (NSIAF) and Saccharomyces boulardii self-induced anaerobic fermentation (SSIAF) on Arabica coffee during wet processing. Over 24 h of fermentation, NSIAF exhibited greater microbial diversity, higher titratable acidity, and increased reducing sugar consumption, while SSIAF provided a more controlled microbial environment dominated by S. boulardii. Volatile compound analysis identified 207 compounds, with lighter roasts showing the greatest number of significantly different compounds between NSIAF and SSIAF treatments. Sensory evaluation revealed a higher cupping score for NSIAF at a light roast (82.08 ± 0.14) compared to SSIAF (81.58 ± 0.14), reflecting distinct flavor charac­ teristics imparted by each fermentation process. Both methods achieved specialty coffee standards (≥80 points), highlighting the potential of NSIAF for complex and diverse profiles and the suitability of SSIAF for consistency and controlled fermentation.


Keywords

No matching items found.


Last updated on 2025-30-05 at 00:00