Bendability and forming behaviour of high strength steel in U bending operation

Conference proceedings article


ผู้เขียน/บรรณาธิการ


กลุ่มสาขาการวิจัยเชิงกลยุทธ์

ไม่พบข้อมูลที่เกี่ยวข้อง


รายละเอียดสำหรับงานพิมพ์

รายชื่อผู้แต่งKaewtatip P., Prasitkhetkhan N., Khantachawana A., Premanond V., Hato R., Sresomreong B., Koga N.

ผู้เผยแพร่Hindawi

ปีที่เผยแพร่ (ค.ศ.)2008

หน้าแรก295

หน้าสุดท้าย300

จำนวนหน้า6

eISSN1745-4557

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899761822&partnerID=40&md5=e7075ffc4c9ef1106d60b6611e6a062c

ภาษาEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


บทคัดย่อ

In this work, the bendability and forming behaviour of high strength steels in U bending were studied. The sheet materials used in the experiments are (JIS) SAPH440 (thickness 2 mm), SPFH590 (thickness 2 mm) and SPFC780Y (thickness 1.2 mm). Firstly, minimum bend radius of each material was investigated. Next, the experiments to compare three different methods of minimizing springback were carried out. The first method is, so called; bottoming that is the reduction of sheet thickness at the bottom of the workpiece or at bended angle by 10%. The second one is bottom overbending, i.e., the method to overbend the workpiece at bottom by 6o. For this method, the punch having a concave bottom surface and the bottom pad having corresponded convex upper surface have been used. The last one is flange overbending, i.e., the method to overbend the flange of workpiece by 6o. This can be done by using the punch having side relief angle (taper punch). The punches and dies edge radii are 5 mm. The clearance between punch and die are determined to be the same as material thickness. Two kinds of sheet layouts were experimented, i.e., the sheets were placed in order that their rolling directions were (1) parallel and (2) perpendicular to the bend line. The results revealed that the springback angle increased with the strength of sheet material. The bottom and flange overbending methods are more effective to reduce springback than bottoming method. In addition, for bottoming method, the force required was about 8 times higher than conventional bending force.


คำสำคัญ

ไม่พบข้อมูลที่เกี่ยวข้อง


อัพเดทล่าสุด 2022-06-01 ถึง 15:28