Consistent Robustness Analysis (CRA) Identifies Biologically Relevant Properties of Regulatory Network Models

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Author listSaithong T., Painter K.J., Millar A.J.

PublisherPublic Library of Science

Publication year2010

JournalPLoS ONE (1932-6203)

Volume number5

Issue number12

Start page1

End page11

Number of pages11

ISSN1932-6203

eISSN1932-6203

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78650735039&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0015589&partnerID=40&md5=01f7c5b8dd5206068862ec16cde1816e

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science


Abstract

Background: A number of studies have previously demonstrated that "goodness of fit" is insufficient in reliably classifying the credibility of a biological model. Robustness and/or sensitivity analysis is commonly employed as a secondary method for evaluating the suitability of a particular model. The results of such analyses invariably depend on the particular parameter set tested, yet many parameter values for biological models are uncertain. Results: Here, we propose a novel robustness analysis that aims to determine the "common robustness" of the model with multiple, biologically plausible parameter sets, rather than the local robustness for a particular parameter set. Our method is applied to two published models of the Arabidopsis circadian clock (the one-loop [1] and two-loop [2] models). The results reinforce current findings suggesting the greater reliability of the two-loop model and pinpoint the crucial role of TOC1 in the circadian network. Conclusions: Consistent Robustness Analysis can indicate both the relative plausibility of different models and also the critical components and processes controlling each model. ฉ 2010 Saithong et al.


Keywords

No matching items found.


Last updated on 2023-04-10 at 07:35