An opaque engineering word list: Which words should a teacher focus on?

Journal article


Authors/Editors


Strategic Research Themes

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Author listWatson Todd R.

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2017

JournalEnglish for Specific Purposes (0889-4906)

Volume number45

Start page31

End page39

Number of pages9

ISSN0889-4906

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84988432359&doi=10.1016%2fj.esp.2016.08.003&partnerID=40&md5=da470ad72265e0e3483a2b751c02e190

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science


Abstract

Word lists have become influential in the last twenty years, but do not help teachers identify which words to explicitly focus on in the classroom. In this paper, I argue that words chosen for an explicit classroom focus should be words that students are likely to have problems dealing with autonomously, and that these are polysemous words where the meaning required is not the usual meaning; in other words, opaque words. The paper shows how to create a list of opaque words for teaching engineering English at a Thai university by comparing the meanings of words in the context against the main meanings given in the online dictionaries that students often rely on. The resulting list shows that most opaque words are high-frequency words with unusual meanings. ฉ 2016 Elsevier Ltd


Keywords

Engineering EnglishOpaque wordsPolysemous wordsWord list


Last updated on 2023-03-10 at 07:36